In Geopolitics Today: Friday, April 11th
Israeli Security Doctrine Threatens 46-Year Egypt Peace Treaty, US Establishes Mineral Extraction Foothold in Uzbekistan, and other stories.
Israeli Security Doctrine Threatens 46-Year Egypt Peace Treaty
Israel's plans for Gaza Palestinians to relocate to Egypt's Sinai Peninsula have driven Egypt-Israel relations to their lowest point since the 1978 Camp David Accords. Multiple Israeli proposals since 2004 have consistently sought to link Gaza's future with Egyptian territory, despite Cairo's categorical rejection of any Palestinian presence in Sinai. This fundamental conflict has prompted Egypt to join South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, breaking the diplomatic restraint established by the Camp David framework that Egyptian officials maintain as the cornerstone of regional stability.
Israel has unilaterally remilitarized the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border, violating prior withdrawal agreements. This action forms part of a broader Israeli security approach that now includes maintaining positions in southern Lebanon and occupying additional Syrian territory beyond the Golan Heights. Israeli security assessments have failed to account for Egypt's guaranteed response to any Palestinian relocation into Sinai: substantial Egyptian remilitarization of the peninsula would immediately follow. This miscalculation regarding Egypt's core security interests threatens the Camp David security architecture that has underpinned Middle East stability for nearly half a century, with potential consequences extending throughout the region as Israel's pre-emptive security doctrine expands.
Read more about this story here.
US Establishes Military Presence in Panama
US troops will operate at Panama-controlled facilities near the canal under an agreement signed April 8, 2025. Panama has rejected formal US bases, while permitting deployments to former US installations constructed pre-1999. This positioning places US forces at a maritime choke point, controlling 6% of global trade volume and 50% of US east-west shipping. The arrangement follows direct US threats regarding canal transit fees and occurs alongside BlackRock's attempted acquisition of key port infrastructure from Hong Kong-based CK Hutchinson.
Language discrepancies in bilateral documents reveal unresolved sovereignty tensions. The Spanish version acknowledges Panama's "inalienable sovereignty" while the English text omits this recognition. US officials have framed the deployment as countering Chinese regional influence during the escalating US-China trade conflict. This marks the first US military return to Panama since 1999 withdrawal, establishing forward position 1,366 miles from Florida and 51 miles from Colombian shipping lanes without formal basing rights. Security Minister Abrego's public rejection of "military bases or defence sites" demonstrates the Panamanian government's attempt to balance US security cooperation against domestic sovereignty concerns.
Read more about this story here.
US Strategy Faces Entrenched Sino-Russian Partnership Structure
The United States has shifted diplomatic strategy toward Russia with direct leadership communication channels established February 2025, proposals for arms control frameworks replacing the expired New START Treaty, and selective sanctions relief on energy exports. The State Department has deployed additional diplomatic personnel to Moscow, while reducing Beijing embassy staffing by 15%. US naval operations in the Black Sea resumed in March 2025 after a three-year pause, concurrent with decreased freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea. These actions mark a departure from the previous administration's simultaneous confrontation of both powers
This US approach intersects with a Sino-Russian partnership anchored by the 2001 Treaty of Good Neighbourliness and Friendly Cooperation, which has operated 23 years without violation. The relationship has intensified with 44 leadership summits since 2012, military exercises increasing from 3 annually to 11 in 2024, and bilateral trade growing from $84 billion to $240 billion. Russia provides China with S-400 air defence systems and nuclear technology, while obtaining semiconductors and consumer goods. Their collaboration has established cross-border military logistics infrastructure, 5G and aerospace technology sharing protocols, and currency swap arrangements that have increased non-dollar trade settlements from 17% to 65% since 2018. Both powers coordinate positions through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, expanded BRICS, and the UN Security Council, creating material constraints on US initiatives to alter regional power dynamics.
Read more about this story here.
US Establishes Mineral Extraction Foothold in Uzbekistan
US companies have secured mineral exploration and processing contracts in Uzbekistan following meetings between Uzbek Investment Ministry officials and US executives in Washington on April 9, 2025. Neither government has disclosed contract values or participating entities. The agreements coincide with diplomatic meetings between Secretary Rubio and Foreign Minister Saidov, alongside separate talks between Deputy Secretary Landau and National Security Council Deputy Chair Kamilov focusing on mining and nuclear cooperation. US officials have expressed interest in participating in Uzbekistan's nuclear sector development, where Russian firm Rosatom currently holds the primary position for building the country's first nuclear plant.
These mineral agreements form part of a broader US strategic resources push across Central Asia, with similar overtures made to Kazakhstan's critical minerals sector. The US resource acquisition efforts occur as Chinese companies secure contracts for 1.5 gigawatt renewable energy projects in Uzbekistan with Chinese financing support. US officials have linked support for Uzbekistan's World Trade Organization membership bid to cooperation in mineral and nuclear sectors. This trilateral competition places Uzbekistan at the intersection of US mineral security interests, Chinese renewable energy expansion, and Russia's established nuclear energy position in a region connecting Asian markets to European consumers. Uzbek officials have explicitly stated interest in diversifying nuclear partnerships beyond existing Russian agreements, creating competitive leverage between major powers.
Read more about this story here.
Historical Grievances Drive China's Resistance to US Pressure
China has mobilized historical memory of 19th century "unequal treaties" to strengthen domestic resistance against US economic demands. This framing transforms trade tensions into a national defence narrative against perceived Western subjugation attempts, connecting current US economic demands with foreign impositions during Qing dynasty decline.
Japan has discussed reducing US Treasury holdings while continuing trade with China— signalling economic concerns without abandoning security ties. Spain has called for Brussels to review China relations, though no formal EU policy shift has occurred. The Taiwan security calculus has changed, as US tariffs at 125% exceed the previous 100% tariff deterrence threshold established against Chinese military action toward Taipei. This reduction in economic consequences for Beijing regarding Taiwan actions creates potential cross-strait vulnerabilities, as China's “never again mentality” faces fewer economic disincentives for assertive posturing. US economic pressure has complicated rather than reinforced regional security arrangements, introducing new variables into East Asian stability calculations.
Read more about this story here.
France Attempts to Restore Algeria Ties
French Foreign Minister Barrot has arrived in Algiers for talks aimed at reversing nine months of deteriorating relations that have cut bilateral trade by 30%. The diplomatic initiative follows a March 31 call between Presidents Macron and Tebboune that established negotiation parameters. French officials have identified specific objectives: resuming suspended security cooperation, resolving deportation disputes, and removing barriers to French commercial operations. The wheat sector has experienced the most severe impact, with French exports to Algeria falling from several million tons annually to 30,000 tons in the current season.
Material interests drive both countries toward accommodation despite unresolved tensions. France requires Algerian cooperation to maintain North African influence after military ejections from Mali and Senegal, while facing domestic pressure over migration policies affecting 10% of its population with Algerian connections. Algeria needs to prevent further isolation as French-Moroccan ties strengthen. Specific obstacles include the imprisonment of Franco-Algerian author Sansal, French threats to revise the 1968 migration pact, and disputes over nuclear testing sites. The talks represent the first significant diplomatic reset attempt since tensions escalated, and will determine whether economic and security imperatives can overcome deep-seated historical grievances that have dominated bilateral relations since Algeria's 1962 independence.