In Geopolitics Today: Wednesday, July 16th
Indonesia Accepts 19% US Tariff Rate, Israel Escalates Damascus Strikes as Syrian Fragmentation Deepens, and other stories.
Indonesia Accepts 19% US Tariff Rate
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto has confirmed that Jakarta accepted a 19% US tariff rate on Indonesian exports, avoiding the threatened 32% levy while granting zero tariffs for US goods entering Indonesia. The agreement includes anti-transshipment clauses targeting Chinese goods rerouted through Indonesia, though the archipelago's 17,000-island geography and limited manufacturing sophistication make it an ineffective Chinese circumvention route.
Indonesia's capitulation exposes Southeast Asian states' constrained position between US market access and Chinese economic partnership, with Beijing serving as Jakarta's largest trading partner. The 19% rate places Indonesia below Vietnam's 20% tariff, establishing a regional hierarchy based on strategic compliance rather than economic merit. Indonesia simultaneously pursues European trade agreements offering zero tariffs, attempting to diversify beyond both powers while managing geographic vulnerability. The tariff structure transforms trade policy into geopolitical leverage, forcing Southeast Asian economies to choose market access over economic optimization. Washington uses differential tariff rates to fragment regional solidarity, preventing coordinated responses to US pressure while isolating China from established supply chains. This approach converts economic dependencies into strategic assets, with trade tools serving containment objectives when applied systematically across interconnected economies.
Read more about this story here.
Israel Escalates Damascus Strikes as Syrian Fragmentation Deepens
Israeli F-35 jets struck Syrian defence ministry headquarters, military command centres, and presidential palace vicinity in Damascus on Wednesday, expanding operations from previous Sweida province buffer zones to direct attacks on central government infrastructure. The Damascus strikes aim to systematically degrade Syrian state capacity beyond territorial seizure, directly attacking government command structures in the capital.
Israeli strategy exploits Syrian institutional collapse to prevent military reconstitution while expanding territorial control through minority protection doctrine. Damascus cannot contest strikes due to simultaneous management of Druze-Syrian clashes in Sweida, Alawite resistance, and Kurdish autonomy challenges across multiple provinces. Turkey condemned Israeli attacks as sabotaging Syrian recovery but provides no military deterrent, while regional powers avoid directly confronting Israeli expansion. The Syrian transitional government lacks military capacity to defend sovereignty while preventing sectarian civil war that threatens regime survival. Israel converts temporary weakness into permanent strategic gains, exploiting failed state conditions to extract territorial concessions and eliminate future security threats through preemptive destruction of assets.
Read more about this story here.
Iraq Faces Extended Blackouts as Iranian Energy Supplies Dwindle
Iraq confronts deepening electricity shortages after losing 4% of its power supply following the expiration of US sanctions waivers for Iranian electricity imports. The country now endures six-hour daily blackouts affecting 42 million citizens, with protests erupting across Najaf, Karbala, Basra, and Dhi Qar provinces. Iraqi officials signed agreements with Turkish company Alfirin Energy to double the Turkey-Iraq transmission line capacity to 600 megawatts, while pursuing alternative suppliers in Jordan and Turkmenistan.
These measures cannot fully compensate for lost Iranian supplies, as Iraq's domestic generation meets only a fraction of demand during peak summer months, when air conditioning consumption surges. Iraq's energy vulnerability extends beyond electricity to natural gas dependencies that generate 40% of the country's power. Iranian gas exports to Iraq dropped from 55 million cubic meters daily to 25 million in early July, forcing gas-fired power stations offline and reducing generation capacity by 3,800 megawatts. Trump administration officials may cancel remaining sanctions waivers permitting Iraqi gas purchases from Iran, while Tehran periodically halts exports to meet domestic demand. Either scenario would trigger extended blackouts limiting electricity to hours per day, expanding current protests into larger demonstrations that could disrupt business operations and provoke violent clashes with security forces ahead of November 2025 parliamentary elections.
Read more about this story here.
Middle East Gas Production Surges Toward Second Global Position
Middle East gas production reached 70 billion cubic feet daily and will surpass Asia to become the world's second-largest gas producing region in 2025, ranking behind North America. Qatar leads expansion with North Field projects increasing LNG capacity 80%, while the UAE adds 10 million tonnes through Ruwais LNG and Saudi Arabia contributes 3 billion cubic feet daily. Iran currently produces 25 billion cubic feet daily, with South Pars field operations disrupted during Israeli airstrikes.
Middle East gas expansion exploits European diversification from Russian supplies and Asian demand growth, positioning the region as a critical energy supplier. Qatar's $50 billion North Field development targets Asian markets with competitive $6 per million BTU breakeven prices, while 10 billion cubic feet daily becomes available for export by 2030. Regional producers secure long-term contracts totalling 21 million tonnes annually between 2027-2030, with Chinese national oil companies and energy majors as primary buyers. Iranian production remains constrained by sanctions and conflict vulnerability, allowing Qatar to potentially surpass Iran as regional leader by the early 2030s. Gulf states convert hydrocarbon reserves into strategic leverage as European energy security and Asian industrial growth create sustained demand.
Read more about this story here.
BRICS Summit Exposes Constraints of Emerging Economies
Brazil hosted the 17th BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro on July 6-7 with half the member state leaders absent. Brazilian President Lula steered discussions toward sustainable development and climate finance, reflecting Brazil's non-alignment strategy. BRICS member states are pursuing divergent geopolitical interests despite shared emerging economy identity. US tariff weaponization forces emerging economies to choose between economic ties with China and political alignment with Washington, eliminating traditional fence-sitting strategies that previously enabled autonomous foreign policy.
Emerging economies face systematic erosion of strategic autonomy as great power competition intensifies and multilateral frameworks collapse. European states pursue de-risking strategies that create convergence opportunities with emerging economies on climate action and trade rules, offering alternatives to US-China bipolarity. Enhanced regional integration through ASEAN, African Continental Free Trade Area, and Mercosur provides collective bargaining power against great power pressure, though resource constraints limit effectiveness. Multi-alignment requires issue-specific partnerships rather than broad coalitions, with states cooperating selectively on climate with Europe while maintaining economic development ties with China. This fragmented approach acknowledges structural realities where no single power provides comprehensive partnership across security, economic, and developmental domains, forcing emerging economies to accept reduced autonomy as the price of continued growth.
Read more about this story here.
Resource Scarcity Threatens Industrial and Military Power
World per capita diesel consumption fell 15% since 2014, constraining agricultural equipment, freight transport, construction machinery, and mining operations dependent on diesel's high energy density. Global diesel production peaked in 2008 before declining through 2024, with oil prices too low to maintain profitable extraction despite adequate reserves.
Resource scarcity drives interstate competition as states compete for minerals essential to industrial capacity and military power. China's manufacturing dominance consumes 56% of global copper, while facing diesel shortages that threaten production capabilities. Platinum production has stagnated due to South Africa's electrical grid failures and coal depletion after 2014 peak output, limiting catalytic converter and hydrogen fuel cell applications. Low commodity prices prevent long-term extraction investment, with uranium shortages constraining nuclear expansion despite proliferation requirements. Diesel scarcity, mineral production limits, and energy transition demands create zero-sum competition where resource access determines industrial capacity and state power projection capabilities. States cannot simultaneously achieve energy security, industrial growth, and strategic autonomy under current extraction constraints, forcing choices between economic development and military preparedness.